You had 2 problems:

1) your file really wasn't well-formed, there was an unclosed comment at
line 2342, you need to delete that!
2) the vendor ID *wasn't* being set at all in the XML file, whereas it is
set in the capture (I still haven't seen the spec).  But its not 3GPP, its
3GPP2 in the capture file.

There AVP definition that worked for me was as follows:

        <avp name="Flow-Operation" code="800" mandatory="must"
may-encrypt="yes" vendor-bit="may" vendor-id="3GPP2">
            <type type-name="Enumerated"/>
            <enum name="TERMINATION" code="0"/>
            <enum name="ESTABLISHMENT" code="1"/>
            <enum name="MODIFICATION" code="2"/>
        </avp>

When you get the APP id, commands, and AVPs working, please do open a
request in bugzilla http://bugs.wireshark.org and attach a patch to an
up-to-date dictionary.xml.

Best regards,
Martin

On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Sabyasachi Samal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Hello Martin,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> Yes the vendor ID is correctly set as 3GPP. regarding the dictionary.xml
> it is opened in my web browser. You may tring to open that in other location
> than the specified location as wireshark as it required all other link
> files. Please try and let me know.
>
> I am sending the capture trace also.
>
> Regards,
> Sabyasachi
>
>
> On 4/2/08, Martin Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I've only had a very quick look, and I haven't seen the Ty interface
> > spec, but have you checked that the vendor ID is correctly set in your AVP
> > definition?  The warning you're seeing below may need to be improved to make
> > it clear that the vendor ID was also used in the comparison, and which one
> > was found in the capture.
> >
> > The other problem I noticed is that whereas the current dictionary.xml
> > loads into my web browser, yours doesn't, suggesting that it may not be
> > well-formed, which might mean that our parser also failed to load and use
> > your AVP definition.
> >
> > Hope this helps.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > P.S.  t couldn't hurt to update to the shiny new Wireshark 1.0 either :)
> >
> >
> >
> >  On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Sabyasachi Samal <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >  Hello Guys,
> > >
> > > I am using wireshark version 0.99.8. I want to capture Diameter stuffs
> > > for Ty interface. I am facing problem while decode the Flow-Operation AVP
> > > having AVP code = 800.
> > >
> > > In wireshark it is showing as
> > >                                AVP Code: 800 Unknown
> > >                                Unknow AVP, if you know what this is
> > > you can add it to the dictionary.xml.
> > >
> > > I have added that but still showing same error. I am attaching the
> > > directory.xml, can any one have a look and please let me know if i have
> > > added in right way or i have to modify some thing more.
> > >
> > > Hope for your cooperation.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > >   Sabyasachi Samal
> > >   IMS Testing Solution
> > >   Nethawk Networks India Pvt. Ltd.
> > >   Bhubaneswar
> > >   Orissa, India
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>   Sabyasachi Samal
>   IMS Testing Solution
>   Nethawk Networks India Pvt. Ltd.
>   Bhubaneswar
>   Orissa, India
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users

Reply via email to