Martin -

I should have included the details in my initial email. Sorry about that.

I am using 0.99.7 on Win XP, the latest download from yesterday.

I looked at bug # 2185 and even followed the command line suggestion but
with my own capture file instead of the one attached to the report. The
problem still persists.

What is your advice in this situation?

Thanks
Prasad


On Jan 25, 2008 3:11 PM, Martin Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I fixed a but matching this description around 2 weeks ago (to fix
> reported bug 2185).  Could you please test with a later build?
>
> Hope this helps,
> Martin
>
> On Jan 25, 2008 7:57 PM, Prasad Shenoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Good people -
> >
> > I am new to this list so I apologize for loose etiquettes,  if any.
> >
> > I would like to report a bug related to Wireshark PDML export feature.
> > While looking at a .pdml export of a recent capture, I noticed a tag
> > mismatch for element <proto> and several occurrences of this mismatch in a
> > single .pdml file.
> >
> > Has anyone noticed or run into this before?
> >
> > Any help and guidance is highly appreciated
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Prasad
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>


-- 
Prasad
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users

Reply via email to