Oh, I am very sorry. Before version 0.99.5 was used. /wbr Ariel Burbaickij
On Jan 15, 2008 11:57 AM, Anders Broman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Well what version vere you using before? Binary H.248 is relativly new and > undervent drastic changes > in the lst year or so... > > Regards > Anders > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ariel > Burbaickij > Sent: den 15 januari 2008 11:38 > To: Community support list for Wireshark > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] h.248 over SCTP > > Hello Andreas, Hello all, > actually we upgraded to 0.99.7 and wireshark decodes the very same stream > nicely. > So much for positive experience ;-). > However, the question is, without going to repository, where there any > changes that could have caused such a drastic change? > > /wbr > Ariel Burbaickij > > On Jan 15, 2008 7:12 AM, Anders Broman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No both *should* work... > > Regards > > Anders > > > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > > Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Ariel Burbaickij > > Skickat: den 15 januari 2008 00:39 > > Till: Community support list for Wireshark > > Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-users] h.248 over SCTP > > > > > > Hello Anders, > > it is actually binary not text. Would it matter for wireshark? > > > > /wbr > > Ariel Burbaickij > > On 1/12/08, Anders Broman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > Traces I have of H.248 over SCTP decodes... > > > Is PPID 7 used? Is it Binary or text? > > > Can you send a small sample trace? > > > Regards > > > Anders > > > > > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > > > Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Ariel Burbaickij > > > Skickat: den 12 januari 2008 11:02 > > > Till: wireshark-users@wireshark.org > > > Ämne: [Wireshark-users] h.248 over SCTP > > > > > > Hello all, > > > we use h.248 over SCTP and wireshark behaves in such a way that I at > > > least need your advise as of now I still hesistate to submit bug report. > > > We observe following: > > > 1) It is not possible to filter on h248 or MEGACO filters user needs > > > to enter sctp protocol payload > > > number in order to get the packets of interest. > > > 2) h.248 content is not being decoded properly, also after applying > > > "decode as..." functionality > > > > > > 3) it is not possible to select H.248/MEGACO if decode should be > > > based on port and not on PPID > > > > > > Question: Is all this known bugs/behaviour, do I do something wrong > > > while working with it or should I submit bug report? > > > > > > > > > /wbr > > > Ariel Burbaickij > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wireshark-users mailing list > > > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org > > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wireshark-users mailing list > > > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org > > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wireshark-users mailing list > > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wireshark-users mailing list > > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-users mailing list > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-users mailing list > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users > _______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list Wireshark-users@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
