On Jan 10, 2008 3:38 PM, Martin Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>
>
> On Jan 10, 2008 3:29 PM, Sake Blok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 03:05:19PM +0100, Marc Luethi wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 16:02 -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:45:33PM +0100, Marc Luethi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > tshark -r file.pcap -T fields -e data
> > > > >
> > > > > This yields to output in hex, which I could cope with, but it
> > lacks
> > > > > the timestamp.
> > > >
> > > > You could add -e frame.time to get the frame's arrival time also
> > >
> > > That's great! Thanks a lot!
> > >
> > > Now I still wonder if I could get ASCII-output of the data field
> > instead
> > > of hex? I mean ASCII in the same way as it interpreted when using -V
> > or
> > > -x.
> > >
> > > I said I could cope with Hex, but it's another layer of complexity,
> > > since I'll get the data strings to search for as ASCII, and it could
> > > save us one conversion step.
> >
> > How'bout:
> >
> > tshark -r <capture-file> -T fields -e frame.time -e data |\
> >  grep `echo -n "<ascii-string>" | xxd -p` |\
> >  cut -f 1
> >
> > Hex-conversion on the fly and resulting in only the timestamps ;-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >    Sake
> >
>
> Now I know why you're presenting "Advanced Scripting and Command Line
> Usage with tshark and Related Utilities" at Sharkfest next year :)
>
> Martin
>
>

This year, I mean.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users

Reply via email to