Joerg Mayer wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:52:47PM +0100, PawelCarqowski wrote: >> > I believe it should not be license problem if I public just my stub code >> like an example. > > I think so too: As long as you only publish the source ther eshouldn't > be any problem. Although from looking at the price tag: Who's going to > use these libs?
According to the Imtelephone site, the free evaluation versions of the libraries can run for 60 hours, which should be more than enough time to analyze a trace file. According to http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+G.729+Licensing, as long as you're using the codec for "study and experimentation" you aren't subject to patent requirements. BTW, an open source G.729/G.723.1 implementation is available at http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/ipp-codecs-g729-g723.1/. Would that be preferable? Asterisk handles G.729 support via an external module which can be purchased from Digium. Would there be any interest in something similar for Wireshark? >> > Should we have such an example on Wiki or directly in the svn source? > > I'd like to have a contrib directory in the source where we could > provide scripts, colorfilters etc. That directory could contain non-gpl > stuff. And this directory might be a good place to put the code for > the plugins that require licensed stuff to be useable. Sounds good to me. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list Wireshark-users@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
