> -----Original Message----- > From: Guy Harris > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 11:23 AM > > Mark G. wrote: > > > But for those of us who are using Wireshark to leech large > > numbers of images from a commercial web site, the incremental > > naming feature would be very helpful. ;-) > > Isn't that what programs such as curl and wget are for? Using Wireshark > seems a bit indirect, especially given that somebody has to be fetching > the file *anyway* in order for Wireshark to see the traffic.
If I could construct the URLs to obtain the images, then I would certainly use a different tool to fetch the data. But I can't. I need to interact with the web site to fetch the images. The web site uses a proprietary viewer which does not appear to cache the images after they are downloaded. So I am using Wireshark extract the images from the data stream. -Mark _______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list Wireshark-users@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
