What's the putput of "show monitor session 1" on the 3560? Can you double check whether the PC with Wireshark on it is indeed patched on the port listed in the output?
Cheers, Sake ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chad Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Community support list for Wireshark" <wireshark-users@wireshark.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 6:08 PM Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Understanding what I'm seeing >I do have "promiscous mode" checked within the Options screen > > Luis EG Ontanon said the following on 10/10/2007 10:22 AM: >> The symptoms are those of not capturing in promiscuous mode, I.e. you >> see only broadcast packets and those directed to your machine (which >> in this case do not exist). >> >> Set the "Capture n promiscuous mode" flag in the capture dialog. >> >> On 10/10/07, Giles Coochey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Obviously the port monitoring is incorrect. Cisco does a great job of >>>> being inconsistent across their product line (but don't tell that to >>> the >>>> layer 3 guys - most insist Cisco can do no wrong as an article of >>> faith). >>> >>> Are you sure that the port monitoring is wrong for a 3560? >>> >>> Maybe I'm missing something. >>> >>> Giles >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wireshark-users mailing list >>> Wireshark-users@wireshark.org >>> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users >>> >> >> > > -- > Chad S. Webb > Systems Administrator > General Dynamics Information Technology > NOAA\NESDIS\NCDDC > Bldg 1100 Rm 117 > Stennis Space Center, MS 39529 > Voice: 228.688.3808 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.gdit.com > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-users mailing list > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users > _______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list Wireshark-users@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
