Hi Developers, The attached ~30KB large pcap file has 1 NR RRC packet and the current latest official WS version 4.4.7 can decode it properly. This is good.
However, when I try to open and decode it with the latest development version, it fails (Version 4.5.0 (6f13ac41b7df)). (I just refetched the whole source code and recompiled again from scratch). *CLI*: ** (wireshark:16076) 14:01:27.439488 [Epan WARNING] -- Dissector bug, protocol NR RRC, in packet 1: ...\wireshark\epan\proto.c:6841: failed assertion "((tree)->tree_data)->start_idle_count < 50000" (nr-rrc.BandParameters_v1540_element) *GUI*: [Dissector bug, protocol NR RRC: ...\wireshark\epan\proto.c:6841: failed assertion "((tree)->tree_data)->start_idle_count < 50000" (nr-rrc.BandParameters_v1540_element)] [Expert Info (Error/Dissector bug): ...\wireshark\epan\proto.c:6841: failed assertion "((tree)->tree_data)->start_idle_count < 50000" (nr-rrc.BandParameters_v1540_element)] [...\wireshark\epan\proto.c:6841: failed assertion "((tree)->tree_data)->start_idle_count < 50000" (nr-rrc.BandParameters_v1540_element)] [Severity level: Error] [Group: Dissector bug] It seems whatever changes could have been done in packet-nr-rrc.c (or somewhere else?) it did heavily impact the start_idle_count (or when it's reset) and the "*PROTO_TREE_MAX_IDLE* *50000*" in proto.c is not enough anymore. I was testing with higher values and ended up with "*PROTO_TREE_MAX_IDLE* *93100*" to make it work and be able to decode the packet (93000 still failed). That is a significant issue, I believe. Could anyone please have a look at what could be the underlying issue? Thank you. Regards, Tamas
large.pcapng
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list -- wireshark-dev@wireshark.org To unsubscribe send an email to wireshark-dev-le...@wireshark.org