You are free to participate in the discussion or not. But I really don't
care to wait for the new committee that is pretty much exactly the same
as the old committee, as far as I can tell.
Anyway silence is another Wireshark project classic. At least you tried
to bring something to the debate, so thank you for that, at least.
On 22/11/23 11:45, Roland Knall wrote:
Hi
I would recommend that we bring this topic before the technical
steering committee. As of right now, that committee needs to be formed
in January and this topic is exactly why we are going to have the
committee in the first place. The process is in the final steps and
should be finished by the end of the year anyway.
I do not think that further discussing this issue is actually
beneficial for the long term resolution of this situation. Both sides
have valid arguments and good pointers and I would suggest as soon as
the committee has taken up the topic we collectively create a single
mission statement as suggested by Joao above. Until then, personally I
will refrain from discussing this further, as I have said everything
there is to say from my perspective.
Do you agree Gerald?
kind regards
Roland
Am Mi., 22. Nov. 2023 um 12:36 Uhr schrieb João Valverde <j...@v6e.pt>:
Maybe you´d like to volunteer to maintain the Wireshark Debian
assets? Since you've got the experience and actually use it?
There are loads of lintian warnings waiting to be fixed, or there
were until recently. Maybe you'd like to start there, and be more
active staying on top of the all-important symbol lists. Just a
thought.
On 21/11/23 15:00, Anders Broman wrote:
Hi,
I found it useful to be able to do Debian packages easily to
provide internal installation packages and even ppa for Ubuntu.
So I have been using the Debian build system.
Best regards
Anders
Den tis 21 nov. 2023 15:48Roland Knall <rkn...@gmail.com> skrev:
As mentioned on the ticket - just putting it here as well - I
am against dropping packaging/debian. But I am for having it
underneath packaging, and not in the main directory, which is
what the original change was about. I respect Joao's opinion
as well as yours Balint. In this case here I think, we can
provide assistance for future implementors and as a starting
point, by keeping the directory underneath packaging/debian.
just my thoughts
Roland
Am Di., 21. Nov. 2023 um 15:28 Uhr schrieb Bálint Réczey
<bal...@balintreczey.hu>:
Hi All,
João shared his opinion about the project's commitment to
maintain the
packaging/debian/ in the project's repository:
https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/commit/79da670bd1b4f91eebee5c96b19eaf1f33c94777#note_1656501952
I believe the current practice is reasonable and
beneficial enough for
many parties to warrant the work, but I could be wrong.
Probably the most important question is if there is
anyone relying on
the packaging scripts there. If you are, please speak up
otherwise the
directory may be dropped.
Comments are welcome.
Cheers,
Balint
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list
<wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list
<wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list<wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
<mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe:https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
<mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list<wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe:https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
