I considered using such a data structure, but the challenge there is that
there's no guarantee of a 'file transfer complete' that could be used to
trigger reassembly and adding to the export objects list. AFAIK, it's also
not possible to have a function to run after all packets were dissected to
generate the export object list entries then.

Moshe


On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 1:11 PM Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 9:34 AM Moshe Kaplan <mosheekap...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Good afternoon,
> >
> > I've been working on MR 1611 for exporting FTP objects. One of the
> complexities is that because the transmitted FTP files are spread across
> multiple "packets", they need to be reassembled by the export objects 'tap'
> into a single block of contiguous memory, so they can be exported. In the
> MR's current implementation, this is done by appending the data from each
> ftp-data packet as it is received.
> >
> > Martin Mathieson commented here:
> > "I would still like to hear more opinions on whether we should export
> data that isn't re-ordered/reassembled. I've unfortunately missed the past
> couple of developer dens. Maybe ask on the dev list about whether it would
> be confuse people, and if it would, whether there are ideas on how to do
> it?"
> >
> > Does anyone have any suggestions as to how to best deal with the problem
> of reordered packets?
>
> I suspect you are going to have to maintain a data structure that
> allows you to reassemble them, but you probably knew that.
>
> How about a data structure (perhaps a hash indexed by starting
> sequence number) with the ending seq number or length and pointer to
> the data and a more-data flag or something.
>
> Then, when you have all the data you can index into the hash table by
> starting sequence number starting at 1.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Richard Sharpe
> (何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者)
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to