Hi folks,
While figuring out how to get a dissection function for
ECDSA_Sig_Value, I noticed that asn2wrs.py no longer generates the
same code it once did.
I re-ran asn2wrs.py against epan/dissectors/asn1/pkcs1/pkcs1.cnf
(unmodified) and then compared the current output to what is checked
in. This is what I get:
-------------------------------------------
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
static int
dissect_pkcs1_DigestAlgorithmIdentifier(gboolean implicit_tag _U_,
tvbuff_t *tvb _U_, int offset _U_, asn1_ctx_t *actx _U_, proto_tree
*tree _U_, int hf_index _U_) {
- offset = dissect_x509af_AlgorithmIdentifier(implicit_tag, tvb,
offset, actx, tree, hf_index);
+ offset = dissect_AuthenticationFramework_AlgorithmIdentifier(implicit_tag,
tvb, offset, actx, tree, hf_index);
return offset;
}
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
static const ber_sequence_t DigestInfo_sequence[] = {
- { &hf_pkcs1_digestAlgorithm, BER_CLASS_UNI, BER_UNI_TAG_SEQUENCE,
BER_FLAGS_NOOWNTAG, dissect_pkcs1_DigestAlgorithmIdentifier },
+ { &hf_pkcs1_digestAlgorithm, -1/*imported*/, -1/*imported*/,
BER_FLAGS_NOOWNTAG, dissect_pkcs1_DigestAlgorithmIdentifier },
{ &hf_pkcs1_digest , BER_CLASS_UNI, BER_UNI_TAG_OCTETSTRING,
BER_FLAGS_NOOWNTAG, dissect_pkcs1_Digest },
{ NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL }
};
...
-----------------------------------
This seems like a problem ...
Perhaps I should file a bugzilla bug.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
