Wow this is great news, thank you Peter!

Regards,
Ahmed

On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 10:21 AM Peter Wu <pe...@lekensteyn.nl> wrote:

> Hi Ahmed,
>
> On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 02:10:01PM -0700, Ahmed Elsherbiny wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've written a dissector for a custom protocol. The dissector works well,
> > and now I'm trying to run the protocol over TLS 1.3.
> >
> > The cipher suite being used is TLS_SHA256_SHA256 (Code: 0xC0B4). This is
> a
> > new cipher suite, it is used for integrity and has a null cipher (The
> > payload is actually plaintext). It is still in draft form, here is the
> > document that describes it:
> > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-camwinget-tls-ts13-macciphersuites-05.txt
> >
> > Looking at the ServerHello packet, Wireshark shows the CipherSuite as
> > Unknown (0xC0B4). Consequently, it does not provide a "Decrypted
> > application data" tab and does not pass the data to my dissector.
>
> The new cipher name was added in the development build via commit
> v3.3.0rc0-513-g3e2a837cc0 (https://code.wireshark.org/review/36052). It
> is not present in the stable build yet.
>
> > This is what the TLS debug log shows:
> [..]
> > I tried adding the cipher-suite to packet-tls-utils.c and recompiling
> > Wireshark. This is the line that I added, since the document says that
> > Diffie-Helman is the only key exchange that can be used. I'm not
> completely
> > sure that I'm using the correct macros - I don't fully understand TLS.
> >
> > {0xC0B4, KEX_DH_ANON, ENC_NULL, DIG_SHA256, MODE_GCM }
>
> This is not correct, TLS 1.3 has a different key exchange (KEX_TLS13)
> and more changes are needed to ensure that existing TLS 1.3 ciphers do
> not break while adding support for this new cipher.
>
> I've created a test samples for the two ciphers and posted these at
> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16543
>
> I hope to have a patch available tomorrow.
> --
> Kind regards,
> Peter Wu
> https://lekensteyn.nl
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to