Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers <tcpdump-work...@lists.tcpdump.org> wrote:
> It's complex, too - and I don't know whether anybody's done a CMake
> version of that.
> Would it make more sense to put the rpcap I-D into either 1) a separate
> team and repository or 2) another repository in the pcapng group, so
> that it has its own Makefile?
That's my preference. One draft per repo.
If you like, make those repo(s) submodules of libpcap if one wants a stronger
connection between the documents and the code.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
