Den mån 9 dec. 2019 19:42 <bugzilla-dae...@wireshark.org> skrev:

> *Comment # 5
> <https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16265#c5> on bug 16265
> <https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16265> from
> Christopher Maynard <christopher.mayn...@igt.com> *
>
> (In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #2 
> <https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16265#c2>)> If you are 
> aware of security issues with the packages we bundle, please let
> > us know and we will see what we can do. Otherwise we generally do not update
> > the libraries in the stable version.
>
> Here's what I've found:
> =======================
> The Gtk+ 2-24 release notes can be found 
> here:https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/blob/gtk-2-24/NEWS.  There is 1 CVE 
> listed,
> although there are numerous bug fixes including for crashes.
>
> The Glib release notes can be found 
> here:https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/blob/master/NEWS.  There are 4 CVE's
> listed, 1 of which is fixed in the 2.61.2 release, which is after the 2.52
> release.  Obviously, there have been numerous bug fixes including for crashes
> as well.
>
> The latest Kerberos for Windows (https://web.mit.edu/kerberos/dist/) version 
> is
> 4.1 based on MIT krb5 1.13, whereas 3.2.2 was based on 1.6.3.  Historical
> releases can be found here: https://web.mit.edu/kerberos/dist/historic.html.
> It isn't quite as easy to review the changes for this project, but there are
> CVE's listed for this project too.  (NOTE: I only looked at the CHANGES for
> 1.13.0, but I count a total of 39 releases after 1.6.3 up to and including
> 1.13.0.)
>
> The libxml2 changelog is 
> here:https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/blob/master/ChangeLog.  I believe
> version 2.9.10 was released a month ago; it's unclear to me if there were any
> CVE's fixed in this release.
>
> The Lua Binaries can be found 
> at:http://luabinaries.sourceforge.net/download.html.  There's 1 release newer 
> than
> 5.2.4, namely 5.3.5.  I didn't look for security vulnerabilities.
>
> The latest available release of nasm is 2.14.02 (with 2.14.03 in rc2 status),
> but that's 30 releases since 2.09.08: https://nasm.us/doc/nasmdocc.html.  I
> don't see any CVE's mentioned, but there are numerous bug fixes, including for
> 4  mentioned crashes post-2.09.08.
>
> It would appear that there have been no updates to Portaudio since v19, so
> Wireshark 2.6 likely has the latest version: 
> http://portaudio.com/download.html
>
> And finally, it would also appear that zlib 1.2.11 is the latest version
> available as well: http://www.zlib.net/
> =======================
>
> It isn't for me to judge the severity of these bugs and the impact (or
> non-impact) to Wireshark, but to try to bring it to the attention of the
> Wireshark community to decide what to do, if anything, regarding upgrading
> these packages (or not).
>
> (In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #4 
> <https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16265#c4>)> When 
> upgrading third party packages, you take the risk of introducing new
> > bug (and yes it happened to us with Npcap for example). So it should be
> > handled on a case by case basis IMHO, and not done systematically.
> > Any help is welcome to mantain the packages up to date of course.
>
> True, but by not upgrading, you end up deploying packages with known bugs and
> vulnerabilities.
>
> But upgrading to our latest package is probably better :-)

> ------------------------------
> You are receiving this mail because:
>
>    - You are watching all bug changes.
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-b...@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
>              mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to