On May 20, 2018, at 6:07 AM, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> Even though MATE has been part of the codebase ‘for a while now’, it is only
> documented in the Wiki.
> Pavel has contributed nice graphics to the story, as well as content. But
> things are still ‘stuck’ on the Wiki for now. My intent is to add the
> contents, verbatim, to the User Guide. That is to say I’m not knowledgeable
> about MATE, but find the content good enough to add it as a chapter to the
> Users Guide.
> Anyone feel that it is out of place there and should not be part of the Users
> Guide?
If it documents how some part of Wireshark works, it belongs in the User's
Guide. This documents how some part of Wireshark works, therefore....
(If people think some parts of the documentation of how Wireshark works should
be a Wiki, to allow user contribution, either
1) we should encourage them to submit changes through Gerrit rather
than through the Wiki
or
2) we should make the User's Guide a Wiki.
Scattering information on how Wireshark works over multiple places makes it
harder for people to find out how Wireshark works, as it means that people
first have to figure out how the Wireshark *documentation* works before they
can use it to figure out how *Wireshark* works.)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
