Den tors 26 apr. 2018 19:08Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> skrev: > On Apr 26, 2018, at 7:56 AM, Anders Broman <a.broma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If I remember correctly the discussion was regarding some arkaic version > (0.9.x) used on SuSE 11. For which we did some changes in autotools. Not > sure if we do for cmake. Just thought we could request something with the > same time line in the distributions as the other restrictions we impose > like glib 2.32. > > If we require libpcap 1.0 and later, we can rely on pcap_create() > existing, which would let us simplify some code. However, if SuSE 11 still > provides an 0.9 release, that'd mean we wouldn't allow building on SuSE 11. > > I'm not sure whether being able to assume the availability of other > routines as a result of requiring a later release would be worth it. >
SuSE 11 is out due to other dependencies so require 1.0 would be OK and perhaps desired then. Regards Anders > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
