On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Richard Sharpe
<realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Pascal Quantin
> <pascal.quan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> 2017-06-13 22:33 GMT+02:00 Pascal Quantin <pascal.quan...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Hi Richard,
>>>
>>> 2017-06-13 22:29 GMT+02:00 Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> After I did a git pull, I started getting this error:
>>>>
>>>> CC packet-lorawan.lo
>>>> packet-lorawan.c: In function 'dissect_lorawan':
>>>> packet-lorawan.c:657:7: error: variable 'frame_length' set but not
>>>> used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
>>>> gint frame_length;
>>>>
>>>> Seems to be related to this:
>>>>
>>>> frame_length = current_offset;
>>>> +#if GCRYPT_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x010600 /* 1.6.0 */
>>>> if (encryption_keys) {
>>>> guint8 *msg = (guint8
>>>> *)wmem_alloc0(wmem_packet_scope(), frame_length + 16);
>>>> msg[0] = 0x49;
>>>> @@ -824,7 +833,9 @@ dissect_lorawan(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo,
>>>> proto_tree *tree _U_, void *d
>>>> if (calculate_mic(msg, frame_length + 16,
>>>> encryption_keys->nwkskey->data) != tvb_get_guint32(tvb,
>>>> current_offset, ENC_LITTLE_ENDIAN)) {
>>>> proto_tree_add_expert_format(lorawan_tree,
>>>> pinfo, &ei_lorawan_invalid_crc, tvb, current_offset, 4, "Invalid
>>>> CRC");
>>>> }
>>>> - } else {
>>>> + } else
>>>> +#endif
>>>> + {
>>>>
>>>> It's a bit rude to cause build errors just because I don't have gcrypt
>>>> 1.6.0 or above.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is currently under process:
>>> https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/22098
>>
>>
>> Could you check is the latest patch iteration works on your machine?
>
> OK, I will now that I have finished the little bit of development I
> was doing ...
Hmmm, it still seems to be there with the latest in the repository,
but I have not checked what's in Gerrit that has not been committed.
I fixed it with this:
-------------------------------
diff --git a/epan/dissectors/packet-lorawan.c b/epan/dissectors/packet-lorawan.c
index fbbc2dd..9a45bda 100644
--- a/epan/dissectors/packet-lorawan.c
+++ b/epan/dissectors/packet-lorawan.c
@@ -654,7 +654,9 @@ dissect_lorawan(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo,
proto_tree *tree _U_, void *d
guint8 fport;
guint32 dev_address;
guint32 fcnt;
+#if GCRYPT_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x010600 /* 1.6.0 */
gint frame_length;
+#endif
gboolean uplink = TRUE;
device_encryption_keys_t *encryption_keys = NULL;
@@ -820,8 +822,8 @@ dissect_lorawan(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo,
proto_tree *tree _U_, void *d
* MIC = cmac[0..3]
* B0 = 0x49 | 0x00 | 0x00 | 0x00 | 0x00 | dir | devAddr |
fcntup/fcntdown | len(msg)
*/
- frame_length = current_offset;
#if GCRYPT_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x010600 /* 1.6.0 */
+ frame_length = current_offset;
if (encryption_keys) {
guint8 *msg = (guint8
*)wmem_alloc0(wmem_packet_scope(), frame_length + 16);
msg[0] = 0x49;
------------------------------------
Maybe something like that is already under review.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
