On 21.10.2016 22:49, Michael Mann wrote: > > Depending on what you're doing, you could go with > proto_tree_add_xxx_format_value. I think that's how most dissectors > end up avoiding the need for BASE_CUSTOM callback.
Maybe one of you has another solution for what I want to realize. In my protocol I've got an ID list with now ~1500 fixed values, where I am using a value_string_ext list. But there are dynamic list entries, for example all IDs between 0x92000000 and 0x92ffffff should be shown as DB.%d.%d using some masks. -- Thomas ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
