I think that attaching some samples would help a lot. On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa <jua...@rti.com > wrote:
> I assumed that you were busy. Thanks for the answer. > > Is there anything I can help with? I may be able to spend some hours this > weekend. > > Thanks, > Juanjo Martin > > On Wednesday, November 18, 2015, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Juan, >> >> 2015-11-18 17:36 GMT+01:00 Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa <jua...@rti.com>: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> It has been almost two weeks and I am surprised I still didn't have a >>> review here. I am surprised because I always get reviews very early! (in >>> the first 24h, which is awesome). >>> >>> https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/11602/ >>> >>> I understand that everyone might be busy. I just want to make sure this >>> is not missed since it is (in my opinion) a very cool feature for RTPS. >>> >>> Any volunteers? :) >>> >> >> As you saw we are quite busy, and polishing Wireshark 2.0 is taking a >> good part or our bandwidth :) >> One of the interest of Gerrit is to ensure that patch sets do not get >> lost ! >> >> Regards, >> Pascal. >> > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
