2015-09-01 3:19 GMT+02:00 Yang Luo <hslu...@gmail.com>:

> Hi Pascal,
>
> Thanks for this bug. This bug is because loopback flag in Npcap driver
> isn't set when the driver is paused and restarted (occurs when system
> resumes from sleep). I have fixed it.
> Try lastest installer at:
> https://svn.nmap.org/nmap-exp/yang/NPcap-LWF/npcap-nmap-0.04-r9.exe
>

Hi Yang,

thanks for the updated driver. I just tested it on the Windows 7 x64 laptop
that was having BSoD beginning of August and I can happily tell you that:
- it does not crash anymore and WiFi is working fine with Npcap installed
- loopback interface is still working after a suspend / resume

Thanks for your work and congratulation for your GSoC. I guess (hope?) it
was considered as being successful :)

Pascal.


>
>
> Cheers,
> Yang
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quan...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> 2015-08-25 12:00 GMT+02:00 Yang Luo <hslu...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi Guy,
>>>
>>> Now PCAP_IF_LOOPBACK flag in pcap_if_t struct will be set for "Npcap
>>> Loopback Adapter" both for DLT_NULL mode and Fake Ethernet mode.
>>> See Npcap 0.04 r8 at:
>>> https://svn.nmap.org/nmap-exp/yang/NPcap-LWF/npcap-nmap-0.04-r8.exe
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Yang
>>>
>>
>> Hi Yang,
>>
>> I noticed an issue when running Npcap 0.4r8 with DLT_NULL option on my
>> Windows 10 x64 host. After putting my laptop in standby mode and resuming
>> my session, when launching Wireshark the Npcap loopback interface is no
>> more working as expected:
>> - the capture is no more done with Null/Loopback encapsulation type, but
>> with Ethernet type using a MAC address 02:00:4c:4f:4f:50
>> - pinging loopback address is no more captured
>> - when checking the interface characteristics with Wireshark GTK UI, the
>> media supported is Ethernet instead of Null/Loopback
>> Rebooting the PC solves the issue. Any idea on how to investigate this?
>>
>> You will find attached th corresponding DebugView log when launching
>> Wireshark.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Pascal.
>>
>>
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to