2014-06-24 5:26 GMT+02:00 Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de>: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:17:32PM -0400, Evan Huus wrote: >> > >> So perhaps what we should do is: >> > >> >> > >> not check generated code into Git; +1
>> > >> >> > >> put all generated code into the source tarballs. > > +2 How about releasing two tarballs, one with and one without the generated files? We could count the downloads. Cheers, Balint > >> > Presumably we should rebuild all the DCERPC files as well at buildtime >> > then? > > YEs, once we have a version in our source that is actually capable of doing > that. > It doesn't build all files for me. > >> If that's possible, yes. I don't actually know how to generate them, so I >> don't know how fast and/or cross-platform it is. > > See epan/dissectors/pidl/README on how to do that in tree (in theory). > > Ciao > Jörg > > > -- > Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de> > We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that > works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
