[I merged a couple of forks of this thread to show more history before
responding.]
On 06/15/14 10:51, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Le 15/06/2014 14:02, Jeff Morriss a écrit :
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 4:31 AM, wsgd <w...@free.fr> wrote:
Must be possible to clone directly the good branch, no ?
>> git clone --branch master-1.12
https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark master-1.12
Why would you want to do that when you can clone the whole thing and
then just check out what you want?
Why clone master when you really want master-1.12?
Before I RTFM'd and discovered the --branch command I used to do as you
suggest but it seemed quite a waste:
git clone [...] master-1.12
git checkout origin/master-1.12 -b master-1.12
git branch -D master
Note that I really want a separate directory that is dedicated to
master-1.12. The whole do-everything-in-one-directory thing takes
entirely too long (right now I can test a fuzz failure against 3 or more
branches in parallel without even having to wait for a recompile let
alone deal with all the mess that gets left behind when switching major
branches--look at git status after switching from a master-1.10 compile
to master for an example).
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
