On 6/13/14 6:35 AM, Alexis La Goutte wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Evan Huus <eapa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Evan, > >> I was poking around gerrit a bit and I found an alternative way of handling >> WIP (work-in-progress) code. Apparently if you push to refs/drafts/BRANCH >> instead of refs/for/BRANCH (or alternatively pass -D to git-review) the >> review ends up in a special draft state that gerrit handles. > No problem to use refs/drafts/BRANCH but for the moment draft is only > see by author... (i think need to modify the Gerrit Configuration) >> >> Thoughts on using this instead of manual [WIP] tags? Openstack's wiki >> suggests not using it because it doesn't play well with their CI (test >> servers) but I don't know if that's an issue for us or not. > Will no be a problem for us (it is possible to choose the branch where > there is CI)
OpenStack added a separate "WIP" state to their Gerrit installation: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/36091/ . It looks like this was needed due to the sheer volume of reviews that they have to deal with. I think it would be overkill in our case. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
