On 4/25/14 10:02 AM, ronnie sahlberg wrote: > > Yes. I think in most cases you want to split packet relations up into > two buckets : > "packets are related because they form a request/reply (and or cancel) pair" > and > "packets are related for some other reason". > > We could fix this by changing all request/response fields to a new > FT_REQUEST_REPONSE type.
This would let the Qt related packet delegate draw its indicators a bit more intelligently. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
