On Apr 4, 2014, at 9:56 AM, John Dill <john.d...@greenfieldeng.com> wrote:
>>> I also noticed a disabled_protos.[ch], so maybe there is a feature to >>> disable other protocols. Is there a feature that could be used to hide >>> protocols I don't need in the Filter Expression (to reduce the list to >>> simplify the interface to users)? >> >> No, I don't think there's a way to simplify what's in the Filter >> Expression dialog short of removing dissectors from Wireshark (probably >> more effort than it's worth). > > The only reason would be to simplify the interface for test engineers who > like to streamline their process (it would remove the need to constantly > type the protocol abbreviation). It would happen at the end of the > development cycle if at all. Can’t you just create some filter macros [1] to do that for you? [1] http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/ChDisplayFilterMacrosSection.html -hadriel ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
