I do <_< That will be it, thanks.
I had enabled it because I was trying to find Asterix on the stable release and assumed it showed hidden protocols or protocol settings :\ Thanks for your time! Sorry :( Matthew Parlane On 4 April 2014 16:52, Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kap...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Do you have the "Display hidden protocol items" enabled in your Protocol > preferences for some reason? That would probably cause that "fake lua item" > to be displayed. > > -hadriel > > > On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:46 PM, Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kap...@oracle.com> > wrote: > > > > > Doesn't happen for me, on Windows-XP (sorry I don't have a newer windows > to try it on right now - my main machine's a Mac). > > > > If you can't show your real script, can you try downloading the > "dissector.lua" one on the script examples wiki page, along with the > "dns_port.pcap" file, and try those to see if you see the same thing with > that? > > > > The examples page is here: > > > > http://wiki.wireshark.org/Lua/Examples > > > > ...and the first section of that page is labeled "A dissector tutorial > script", with the download link for "dissector.lua" and a few paragraphs > later the link for "dns_port.pcap". > > > > -hadriel > > > > On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:04 PM, Matthew Parlane <parl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hey everyone, > >> > >> I grabbed the latest Wireshark-win64-1.11.3-2224-gdf52f81.exe install. > >> > >> Made a lua script for decoding a simple protocol header and I am > getting: > >> > >> User Datagram Protocol > >> <lua fake item> > >> Blah Protocol > >> > >> Basically my lua is > >> > >> > >> local p_blah = Proto("blah","Blah Protocol"); > >> blah.fields = {... } > >> function p_blah.dissector(buf, pinfo, root) > >> local t = root:add(p_blah, buf(0,BLAH_HEADER_SIZE)) > >> t:add(f_item1, buf(0,4)) > >> -- root:set_text("What?") > >> end > >> > >> Now if I do the root:set_text("What?"), it changes from <lua fake item> > to <Text item> > >> > >> > >> User Datagram Protocol > >> <Text item> > >> Blah Protocol > >> > >> > >> The Blah protocol decodes perfectly, so that's fine. Just curious how > to correctly add the nodes so that it doesn't give this extra row of fake > lua ? > >> > >> > >> p.s. Sorry on light details, I can't share the specs. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Matthew Parlane > >> > ___________________________________________________________________________ > >> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > >> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > >> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > >> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
