I believe the standard is typically to use the abbreviated SHA of the commit (first 8-10 chars is usually enough to guarantee uniqueness). I don't know whether bugzilla currently auto-links such text, but presumably it can be configured.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kap...@oracle.com> wrote: > In the past with svn, when we found a bug caused by a previous code change, > we used the revision number in bugzilla comments with a leading 'r', like > 'r12345'. This would auto-create a very convenient url link in bugzilla to > the svn browsing web pages. Now that we're on git, do we: > 1) continue to use revision numbers? or do we use commit ids? or change-ids? > 2) continue to use 'r[number]' in bugzilla, or some new syntax? > > -hadriel > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
