Dear all,
is it allowed to add an FT_BYTES hf entry with len==0 to the protocol
tree?
E.g.
proto_tree_add_bytes_format_value(tree, hf_myproto_myval,
tvb, offset, 0, NULL, format, ...)
The idea would be to allow filtering for this element although it has no
value (it's just there).
When I do this, I run into an assert in proto_custom_set(),
case FT_BYTES:
bytes = (guint8 *)fvalue_get(&finfo->value);
... bytes_to_string(bytes, ...) -> DISSECTOR_ASSERT
Who's at fault here: proto_custom_set() or the caller?
Regards,
Martin
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
