2013/10/14 didier <dgauthe...@magic.fr>

> Hi,
> Le dimanche 13 octobre 2013 à 16:43 -0400, Evan Huus a écrit :
> > On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Jakub Zawadzki
> > <darkjames...@darkjames.pl> wrote:
> > > About tvb_offset_exists() comment, compute_offset() is not returning
> > > exception when offset == tvb->length.
> >
> > Ah, OK. Should it? When offset == tvb->length I would think that
> > should be an exception, since no bytes exist at that location. There
> > are other places that call compute_offset and don't check the == case
> > that maybe should...
> On the other hand is doing parsing with tree NULL and flags.visited
> false or colinfo not null worth it? There's so many bugs, Personally I
> gave up on it.
>
> One example with tshark, without a tree tcp flags aren't set anymore in
> colinfo (cf packet-tcp.c around line 4228, since
> dfa2156e301539929a12dda54752c778c3ee7a39 remove 'check_colinfo')
> and so on...
>

Hi Didier,

this is fixed in r52597. If you spotted other regressions, please notify us.

Thanks!
Pascal.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to