On 12 October 2013 23:38, Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 07:31:27PM +0100, Graham Bloice wrote:
> > On 11 October 2013 16:09, Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Another milestone hit:
> > >
> > > - Win 32bit: The following executables build and run from the build
> > > directory
> > >   (as well as capture if they should be able to). *: Acutally tested
> > >   $ ls *exe
> > >   capinfos.exe* dumpcap.exe  mergecap.exe  randpkt.exe   reordercap.exe
> > >  tshark.exe*
> > >   dftest.exe    editcap.exe  qtshark.exe*  rawshark.exe  text2pcap.exe
> > > wireshark.exe*
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Using CMake to generate a MSVC2010 solution, I can't get near that number
> > of successful executables.  I have used the CMake generated solution with
> > command line build (msbuild Wireshark.sln) and from within VS.
>
> I can look into this but probably not within the next two weeks as I'm
> currently
> trying to get this to "featurecompleteness" first and because I don't know
> that
> process (msbuild) at all. OK, I don't expect to reach that within two
> weeks, but
> I hope to have the most important items covered by then.
>
>From a Visual Studio command prompt (probably the same one you use for
nmake)  cause CMake to generate the appropriate output (not passing -G does
that for me) then type `msbuild Wireshark.sln`.

It's make on steroids, but also works with Visual Studio solutions.  A
Visual Studio solution (for 2010 onwards) is a set of xml files.  The .sln
file lists all the projects aka targets, and each project file has all the
instructions to build that project.


>
> >  I do have
> > modified CMake files in an attempt to group the "projects" in Visual
> Studio
> > into some sort of logical tree rather than the large flat list.  I don't
> > believe these changes affect the CMake output to actually build things.
> > I've also enabled the use of make-tap-reg.py for creating the tap
> register
> > functions which seems to work.
>
> Sounds good to me. UseMakeDissectorReg.cmake only implements the python
> version,
> no idea why I implemented the shell version in UseMakeTapReg.cmake.
>

I'll try these changes out on a Linux CMake build to make sure they don't
break anything and then commit them.  Should I set UseMakeTapReg to use
Python in all platforms or just Windows?


>
> > Problems I have seen \ am stuck with:
>
> Again vs specific or with nmake as well?
>

All VS2010 solution.

>
> >    - epan generated files always get rebuilt, e.g. diam_dict.c and the
> like
> >    - epan won't create register.c, make-dissector-reg.py complains about
> a
> >    missing file, from the output the filename looks odd, I suspect I'm
> hitting
> >    some command line limit:
> >
> > 1>  Generating register.c
> > 1>  Registering 1151 files, 0 cached
> > 1>  Traceback (most recent call last):
> > 1>    File "E:/Wireshark/trunk/tools/make-dissector-reg.py", line 126, in
> > <module>
> > 1>      file = open(filename)
> > 1>  IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
> > 'E:/Wireshark/trunk/epan\\dissectos/packet-dua.c'
> > 1>C:\Program Files
> > (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft.Cpp\v4.0\Microsoft.CppCommon.targets(151,5):
> error
> > MSB6006: "cmd.exe" exited with code 1.
>
> That's again interesting. It works for me using cmd (on Win7). I'm not so
> sure
> about the source of the problem. What do you get when you
> dir E:/Wireshark/trunk/epan\\dissectos/packet-dua.c
> Ah, forget it: Where does the spelling dissectos come from?
>

I know, it's really odd.  The command in the solution is built correctly.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to