Can we please discuss the removal of files before doing so?
IIRC, while the 4 clause BSD license is incompatible with the
GPL, the regents granted a general "amnesty" so code copyrighted
by them gets treated like a 3 clause BSD license.
I currently just lack the nerve/time to look this up and by the
time I have the cmake stuff sort of going for Windows I will probably
have forgotten about this :-(
Ciao
Jörg
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 07:04:11PM +0000, eapa...@wireshark.org wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=52413
>
> User: eapache
> Date: 2013/10/06 07:04 PM
>
> Log:
> Remove packet-vj.c as it does not appear to be under a license we can use.
>
> Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
> Changes Path Action
> +0 -1 Makefile.common Modified
> +0 -879 packet-vj.c Removed
>
> Directory: /trunk/epan/
> Changes Path Action
> +0 -1 CMakeLists.txt Modified
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-commits mailing list <wireshark-comm...@wireshark.org>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits
>
> mailto:wireshark-commits-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
