Hello, Matthieu raised an issue that I've seen with asn2wrs generated dissectors too, just not to the extent of the pidl dissectors. To make it much harder to miss that the changes we are doing are to generated dissectors I see two approaches: - Name the files differently, e.g. prefix with gpacket- instead of packet-, so we know when we check that file in that there should be an accompanying basefile or generator patch. - Have a checkin script check for the term generated in the first few lines and annotate the commit message that a generated file was changed.
Thoughts? Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
