On 9/20/13 2:15 AM, Graham Bloice wrote: > I believe the Chocolatey install script in a package can put the files > in any location, they just have defaults. Chocolatey is a machine-wide > package manager and NuGet seems to be more focused on libraries for > specific apps, hence targeting the app source directory. > > We have a mix of requirements, the (possibly machine-wide) > infrastructure (VS, cygwin, python, CMake??, etc.) and then the > libraries to link with (gtk, glib, qt etc.) so I'm not certain which > tool is best, but it would seem that as Chocolatey has a wider range > than NuGet it may be more appropriate.
I hadn't realized that Chocolatey falls back to the official NuGet repositories, i.e. "chocolatey install jquery" downloads the jQuery package from nuget.org and installs it in C:\Chocolatey\lib. This might make managing dependencies a lot simpler. > I still haven't looked into CoApp yet. The part I'm using (AutoPackage) seems to make it easier to create a properly-laid-out NuGet package but we could probably generate the .nuspec files ourselves. The OBS → NuGet scripts are at https://github.com/geraldcombs/wireshark-win-packaging if anyone wants to play with them. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
