Mark Vitale skrev 2013-09-11 21:42:
I've used Wireshark for years but I'm brand new to Wireshark development.

I have a few patches to dissector packet-afs that were given to me by a 
customer to submit on their behalf.
I have the current Wireshark source and have my toolchain set up on a Centos6 
box to build 1.6, 1.8, or 1.10 successfully.
The patches were originally written against 1.6.  I'm currently forward-porting 
them to master, but I have
no way to build and test master patches in my current environment because the 
Centos repos do not in general
have the latest preregs (for gtk3, pango, glib, etc) required to configure and 
build the current tip/master/trunk
(whatever you all call the development branch).  I do not want to get into 
downloading toolchain sources and
maintaining dependencies manually; I'd much rather stick with packages if 
possible.

My understanding from reading the developer docs is that I should open bug 
reports and attach my patches
to the tickets.   These patches should apply to the tip, not to a particular 
release.  Do you ever
make exceptions to this policy?  That is, would you accept patches against 1.10?

If not, I'll make a new vm with a Linux distro that's not so conservative in 
its repo policies.
Is there a particular distro you would recommend for Wireshark development, or 
doesn't it matter much?
My only requirements are the need to use a package manager (yum/apt/whatever) 
to automate my
dependency checking, and that its repos be current enough to configure and 
build the latest Wireshark.

Thanks,
--
Mark Vitale
mvit...@sinenomine.net

You should be able to build trunk on CentOS 6 ( unless GTK2 is to old) ./configure --with-gtk2 Otherwise you could attach patches for 1.10 in a bug report they might apply to trunk.
Regards
Anders


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to