On Aug 12, 2013, at 6:22 AM, Martin Kaiser <li...@kaiser.cx> wrote: >> I'm not really familiar with SIP over TCP (in all my use cases, SIP is >> over UDP) but your proposal makes sense. > > Thanks Pascal, > > that explains why nobody spotted this so far.
I think it's more because it's only the heuristic SIP/TCP dissector, instead of the normal SIP/TCP dissector. (Or at least I've never noticed a problem dissecting SIP/TCP, which I do on occasion.) But yeah your fix looks right. -hadriel ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
