Hi, This patch fixes it...
-----Original Message----- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Anders Broman Sent: den 6 augusti 2013 16:05 To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] addr_resolv.c, transport name resolution appalingly slow. -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Evan Huus Sent: den 6 augusti 2013 16:01 To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] addr_resolv.c, transport name resolution appalingly slow. On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Anders Broman <anders.bro...@ericsson.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I will revert the change to use a hash table for transport name >> resolution as soon as I can, the performance is horrible. > >It shouldn't be, glib hash tables are pretty efficient. If you profile, where >is the time being spent? Can't profile it just now... ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
addr.patch
Description: addr.patch
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
