Thus wrote Bálint Réczey (bal...@balintreczey.hu): > I have started describing a Gerrit based workflow which IMO would fit > to the project at http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Workflow . > Please check it and share your opinion.
would that mean that even the most basic change needs peer review and approval based on the process defined by gerrit? I'm a bit worried that this doubles the time for such simple changes. I often see this in corporate environments where people don't correct typos, misleading variable names, formatting etc. because they can't be bothered with the administrative overhead. Regards, Martin ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
