On May 12, 2013, at 11:07 PM, Anders Broman <a.bro...@bredband.net> wrote:
> Guy Harris skrev 2013-05-11 19:45: >> On May 11, 2013, at 7:28 AM, Ambarisha B <b.ambari...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I was trying to move the reassembled data from the reassembled_table to >>> frame_data. > > If the pointer to the reassembled data is stored in the per_packet_data in > frame_data the memory usage should work out to be the same or a bit less as > the reassembled hash table wouldn't be needed, right? If it's stored as per-packet data, then it involves no change to the frame_data structure, so it doesn't involve increasing the size of that structure (which would involve adding 4 to 8 bytes for every packet). ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
