On 10/03/2013, at 5:13 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
Hi Evan,
Thanks for your help.
<...>
> I'm not sure I follow this. Can't you simply store the most recent
> sequence number in the conversation struct, and increment it for each
> PDU received?
I tried to do this, and perhaps I just got it (slightly) wrong.
In my foo_dissect() function, I looked up the conversation, grabbed the latest
sequence number, incremented it, and wrote it back to the conversation. I
displayed it in the tree_item for the PDU, and in the COL_INFO, which was
basically what I was after.
The issues I had seemed to be related to when my dissection function was
called: if I scrolled from start to end of the capture, it was fine. If I
jumped to the final frame, the sequence number wasn't incremented for the
intervening PDUs.
Perhaps I need it to be done outside my if (tree) { ... } ?
Thanks again; any suggestions appreciated,
d
>
> Evan
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
