On Feb 6, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> Note also that the CPUID instruction first showed up on the 486; Wireshark
> might not run very well on a 386 box, but we should at least arrange not to
> crash with an illegal instruction fault.
And here's Intel's documentation on how to do it:
http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/application-notes/processor-identification-cpuid-instruction-note.pdf
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
