At least as I read

        http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms717358(v=vs.100).aspx

and

        http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff660764(v=vs.100).aspx

it might be possible to just download and install the Windows SDK and get 
command-line tools without installing Visual Studio.

Does anybody know whether that works?  (Given how badly attempting to uninstall 
various items from my Windows 7 virtual machine failed, I might have to create 
a fresh new virtual machine to try that out.)

The relationship between Visual Studio and the Windows SDK seems a bit 
confusing.  Visual Studio 2010 Express Edition doesn't include compilers 
necessary to build 64-bit binaries, but you can install the Windows 7 SDK and 
get those compilers.

Note, however, that "Visual C++ compilers are removed when you upgrade Visual 
Studio 2010 Professional or Visual Studio 2010 Express to Visual Studio 2010 
SP1 if Windows SDK v7.1 is installed":

        http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2519277

(perhaps SP1 throws out all the compilers and installs new ones, and doesn't 
realize that if you had VS 2010 Express *and* the Windows SDK 7.1 you had 
compilers targeting 64-bit ISAs and should therefore get new ones), so you have 
to install the "Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 Service Pack 1 Compiler Update for 
the Windows SDK 7.1":

        http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=4422

to get them back.

I've updated the Developer's Guide "Win32: Step-by-Step Guide" section to 
reflect what Gerald told me when I asked about doing 64-bit builds with VS 2010 
EE and what I discovered when setting up the build environment on my 64-bit 
Windows 7 virtual machine, although I still need to update it to note that if 
you install the Windows SDK, it supplies the vcredist_*.exe files, so you don't 
need to download them separately.

The "Microsoft compiler toolchain (Win32 native)" section needs some more work 
to discuss 64-bit building (unless we want separate "Win32 native" and "Win64 
native" sections).  It also claims that you don't get the SDK with the Express 
Editions of Visual Studio, but, for building 32-bit binaries, the Express 
Editions contain a subset of the SDK headers and libraries sufficient to build 
Wireshark.  As per the above, they *don't* contain the compilers necessary to 
build any 64-bit binaries.

If the Professional and fancier versions of Visual Studio include a full SDK 
and 64-bit compilers, and if the SDK is sufficient to do command-line builds, 
it sounds as if:

        SDK alone - costs you no money, lets you build 32-bit and 64-bit 
binaries, but you have no GUI tools, just command-line tools;

        VS Express Edition alone - costs you no money, lets you build 32-bit 
Wireshark binaries (but there might be SDK stuff missing for Windows features  
we *don't* use) and gives you some GUI tools, but you can't build 64-bit 
binaries and you don't get all the GUI tools (such as the resource editor);

        VS Express Edition + SDK - costs you no money, lets you build 32-bit 
and 64-bit binaries, and gives you some GUI tools, but doesn't give you all the 
GUI tools (such as the resource editor);

        VS Professional Edition and up - lets you build 32-bit and 64-bit 
binaries, gives you more (all?) GUI tools, but costs money.

Is there anything in the SDK that doesn't come with VS Professional Edition?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to