That's what the commit message was about: They do create warnings. Please move them back.
thanks Joerg On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 08:06:50PM +0000, g...@wireshark.org wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=40479 > > User: guy > Date: 2012/01/13 12:06 PM > > Log: > Only one instance of packet-dcerpc-mapi.c and packet-dcerpc-mapi.h, > please. > > Move some generated DCERPC dissectors back to the clean list; if they > actually *do* generate warnings, move them back. > > Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ > Changes Path Action > +2 -4 Makefile.common Modified > > Directory: /trunk/epan/ > Changes Path Action > +2 -2 CMakeLists.txt Modified > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-commits mailing list <wireshark-comm...@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits > > mailto:wireshark-commits-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe -- Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
