"Weir, Alan" wrote: >The log indicates that the removal should be benign as it eliminated a warning >but in my case (and others based on googling the error message) it prevents >the cycwin path from being constructed correctly. > >I'm not a cycwin expert - anyone have any insight?
Could be, but I'd need a bit more information. For instance which version of cygwin are you using and what precisely is the error? Ed ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe