"Weir, Alan" wrote:
>The log indicates that the removal should be benign as it eliminated a warning 
>but in my case (and others based on googling the error message) it prevents 
>the cycwin path from being constructed correctly.
>
>I'm not a cycwin expert - anyone have any insight?

Could be, but I'd need a bit more information.  For instance which version of 
cygwin are you using and what precisely is the error?

Ed
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to