On Oct 7, 2011, at 4:40 AM, Martin Kaiser wrote: > Thus wrote Guy Harris (g...@alum.mit.edu):
(At this point, I really wish my name were Zarathustra. :-)) > I've been > playing with a new port_type PT_DVBCI_SESSION_NUMBER and set both source > and destination port to the session number. Does that make sense or is > there a better approach? The ""circuits" for protocols that have a virtual circuit ID of some sort" was based on an existing mechanism in Wireshark, which I put there originally for the benefit of the Frame Relay dissector, and later used in X.25 and elsewhere; see epan/circuit.h and routines using it. It sounds as if DVB-CI has what amounts to a VC ID, the session number. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
