On Sep 15, 2011, at 6:39 AM, Chris Maynard wrote: > But the -e option isn't valid without -T fields, so that implies that -T > fields > was erroneously omitted in the wish list request, does it not?
No. It could also imply that they wanted to have the "-e" option also work with "-T", but, in the case where "-T text" was specified (or implied by the absence of a "-T" flag) rather than "-T fields", they wanted it to specify protocols or individual fields to expand in the output. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
