On Aug 13, 2011, at 10:26 PM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:21 PM, <g...@wireshark.org> wrote:
>> Log:
>> Say "none" rather than "unknown" if there are no IP addresses; in most
>> if not all cases, it's not that we don't know the IP addresses, it's
>> that there are no IP addresses to know.
>
> What about displaying nothing in the interface list, and "none" in the
> details?
> Like in the attached patch.
I've committed the patch in r38520 which some whitespace changes.
Thanks for providing it.
>
> BTW, why do we build the same string ("<b>%s</b>\n<span
> size='small'>%s</span>") 4 different places?
Two for the initial setup of the interface list, one might be able
to reduce it to one.
One for adding a row (when adding a new remote interface)
One for updating a row.
Best regards
Michael
>
>
> --
> Stig Bjørlykke
> <interface-list-no-none.patch>___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
