Guy Harris <guy@...> writes: > What exactly do people want with those byte counts?
I don't presume to know what one might want to use that data for. I am merely trying to report the most meaningful information possible. > ...which means that you can't get a link-layer byte count that pertains to what was actually sent out over > any network link. It was just an example. I have similar Ethernet captures, so substitute a 14 byte Ethernet header for a 16-byte Linuxed cooked capture. The point and question remains. What is the most accurate/desirable/expected number to report? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
