A patch for fixing this issue has been submitted via bugzilla: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5977
kind regards, Roland On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Roland Knall <rkn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: >> However, if this is the cause of >> >> >> http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Ubuntu-10.04-x64/builds/1452/steps/fuzz-menagerie/logs/stdio >> >> then that raises the question "why isn't the SERCOS III plugin being loaded >> when we're doing the fuzz testing?" If the plugins aren't getting loaded, >> that means they're not getting fuzz tested. >> >> This also raises the question of whether the SERCOS III dissector should be >> made a built-in dissector. > > I will provide a patch fast for checking if the SERCOS III plugin > get's loaded, and if the subdissector table is available (you can > expect it today). > > If you want, I will also provide a patch for removing the standalone > SERCOS III plugin and integrating it as a built-in dissector. This > will take some time, but I guess by monday it should be done. > > kind regards, > Roland > ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
