Jeff Morriss wrote:
Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
- I had the same issue with another project, and we created macro:
#define __(x) ((x) ? (x) : "(null)")
and use it when passing possible-null-strings. It's still PITA but
IMHO it looks a little better than doing it by hand.
I don't mind doing it by hand (and in some cases I prefer NOT having
another layer of abstraction), but then we still need to have a way to
(regularly) test for it.
Oh, and I figured fuzz testing on the Solaris buildbot would not be a
good solution because only people with access to Solaris boxes would be
able to reproduce the crash...
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
