Right, so I've just added the latest revisions of the source files to a new bug report (5868).
Please feel free to play with the code, and provide comments/criticism/suggestions for improvement. Tyson. On 28 April 2011 15:42, Chris Maynard <chris.mayn...@gtech.com> wrote: > Stephen Fisher <steve@...> writes: > > > > If there's any interest, I'd be willing to try and clean it up for > > > potential submission into mainline Wireshark. > > > > Sure, why not contribute it. I'm sure someone will find it useful at > > some point. > > Oops, meant to respond sooner, but yes, I for one would be interested. > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe > -- Fight Internet Censorship! http://www.eff.org http://vmlemon.wordpress.com | Twitter/FriendFeed/Skype: vmlemon | 00447934365844
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
